Sök artiklar i SveMed+

Observera: SveMed+ upphör att uppdateras!



Behandlingsunnlatelse, etikk og jus
Engelsk titel: Withholding and withdrawing treatment, ethical and legal aspects Läs online Författare: Pedersen R ; Bahus MK ; Kvisle EM Språk: Nor Antal referenser: 34 Dokumenttyp: Översikt UI-nummer: 07061878

Tidskrift

Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening 2007;127(12)1648-50 ISSN 0029-2001 E-ISSN 0807-7096 KIBs bestånd av denna tidskrift Denna tidskrift är expertgranskad (Peer-Reviewed)

Sammanfattning

BACKGROUND : In the wake of medical progress an important ethical discussion has arisen about when to withhold and when to withdraw life-sustaining treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS : Literature on withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment was assembled and analyzed, and common norms were compared with Norwegian legal regulations. RESULTS : Withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment is not unusual when the treatment is regarded as futile. As opposed to euthanasia, limiting treatment is under certain circumstances legal. Core values--such as respect for the value of human life, the duty to save lives, equality, respect for patient autonomy, dignified death and professional integrity--may be given diverging emphases and interpretations. In many cases, the patient's capacity to consent is reduced, and it can be challenging to determine what is in the patient's best interest and when the treatment is futile. Good decision making processes and communication at the end of life is demanding, but may reduce and prevent many difficulties. INTERPRETATION : Norwegian healthcare legislation provides relatively little and to some extent unclear guidance on withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment. National guidelines have not been developed. More attention could be paid to systematic approaches and dialogue with patients, relatives and all healthcare professionals about these issues.