Sök artiklar i SveMed+

Observera: SveMed+ upphör att uppdateras!



Sammenslåing av tre sykehus til ett universitetssykehus
Engelsk titel: Merging of three hospitals into one university hospital Läs online Författare: Ingebrigtsen, Tor ; Lind, Marit ; Krogh, Thomas ; Laegland, Jorunn ; Andersen, Hege ; Nerskogen, Even Språk: Nor Antal referenser: 16 Dokumenttyp: Artikel UI-nummer: 12057926

Tidskrift

Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening 2012;132(7)813-7 ISSN 0029-2001 E-ISSN 0807-7096 KIBs bestånd av denna tidskrift Denna tidskrift är expertgranskad (Peer-Reviewed)

Sammanfattning

Background. The merging of hospitals into health enterprises ensued from the Norwegian hospital reform of 2002. A complex restructuring process lasting from 2007 to 2009 resulted in the merger of three hospitals into the University Hospital of North Norway. Material and method. Clinical activities were reorganised into fewer and larger units (divisions) and changed from in-patient to day treatment. Leadership was established across geographic units, and a programme for improving patient care pathways was launched. The experience gained is described by means of activity data from January 2006 to April 2011. Results. The number of patient contacts in the somatic sector was temporarily reduced by 7 per cent in 2009. The mean waiting period increased from 80 days in 2006 to 108 days in 2010, but fell to 85 days in 2011. In psychiatry and specialised cross-disciplinary addiction therapy, the number of patient contacts increased, and waits were unchanged or shortened. National quality indicators showed unchanged or improved results. The number of scientific publications increased by 62 per cent. Productivity (DRG points per employee-month) increased from 0.73 to 0.79. The annual financial outcome was improved by NOK 537 million (12 per cent of the 2006 budget). 81?% of the employees were satisfied with their jobs after the restructuring. Interpretation. We maintained activity and the quality of patient care at a high level through the change period, and the hospital’s financial position has improved. The methods used do not allow conclusions on possible causal relationships between the change process and the results achieved in core activities.