Sök artiklar i SveMed+

Observera: SveMed+ upphör att uppdateras!



Psykometriske egenskaper til Motorisk test i NUBU 4-16: Undersökelser av interskårer- reliabilitet, samtidig validitet og anvendelighet
Engelsk titel: Psychometric properties of the Motor test in NUBU 4-16: Investigations of interscorer reliability, concurrent validity and utility Läs online Författare: Andrup, Grete ; Janson, Harald ; Gjaerum, Bente Språk: Nor Antal referenser: 29 Dokumenttyp: Artikel UI-nummer: 12093741

Tidskrift

Fysioterapeuten 2012;79(8)16-23 ISSN 0016-3384 KIBs bestånd av denna tidskrift Denna tidskrift är expertgranskad (Peer-Reviewed)

Sammanfattning

Aim: To investigate interscorer reliability of the Motor test in the new Norwegian test battery NUBU 4-16 (Neuro-motor assessment of children and youth 4-16), as well as concurrent validity and utility against the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (MABC-2). Design: Two studies: (1) Quantitative analyses of test scores from two independent scorings. (2) Quantitative analyses of test scores and questionnaire responses regarding utility and time consumption. Materials and method: (1) 36 children assessed with the Motor test. Experienced physiotherapists scored the tests independently based on video recordings. (2) 52 children assessed with the Motor test and MABC-2 by experienced physiotherapists who also responded to open-ended questions. Results: A high interscorer reliability: The intraclass correlation for the total score was 0.99, and the overall agreement for categorical scores was 86 per cent. The Motor test and MABC-2 displayed equivalent distributions of age-related percentiles. The correlation between age-related percentiles for total scores from the two tests was 0.68. Testers agreed to a great extent that the five areas of the Motor test provide a nuanced picture of children’s motor skills; however, the test is time-consuming. MABC-2 takes less time to administer. Conclusion: Experienced testers can score the Motor test reliably. The Motor test and MABC-2 may be assumed to measure the same broad construct of motor skills. The Motor test may provide a more nuanced picture of children’s motor skills, but requires longer time to administer.