Sök artiklar i SveMed+

Observera: SveMed+ upphör att uppdateras!



Risiko for bias ved blindet versus ublindet vurdering af artikler i systematiske oversigtsartikler - en gennemgang af et Cochranereview
Engelsk titel: Risk of bias by blinded vs unblinded evaluation of articles in systematic reviews Läs online Författare: Möller, Ann Merete Språk: Dan Antal referenser: 11 Dokumenttyp: Kommentar UI-nummer: 13067404

Tidskrift

Ugeskrift for Laeger 2013;175(14)951-4 ISSN 0041-5782 E-ISSN 1603-6824 KIBs bestånd av denna tidskrift Denna tidskrift är expertgranskad (Peer-Reviewed)

Sammanfattning

A Cochrane review investigated the effect of blinding information of authors, institutions, journals and sponsorships in assessing the presence of bias in trials that were assessed for inclusion in a systematic review. Six randomized trials were included. The results of these were quite heterogeneous and from this review it is not possible to conclude anything about the effect of blinding with certainty. However, it proved time-consuming to implement a secure blinding and until further evidence appears, it is recommended to refrain from attempts to do so.