Sök artiklar i SveMed+

Observera: SveMed+ upphör att uppdateras!



Assessing risk for inpatient physical violence in a female forensic psychiatric sample – comparing HCR-20v2 with the female additional manual to the HCR-20v2
Engelsk titel: Assessing risk for inpatient physical violence in a female forensic psychiatric sample – comparing HCR-20v2 with the female additional manual to the HCR-20v2 Läs online Författare: Strand, Susanne J M ; Selenius, Heidi Språk: Eng Antal referenser: 36 Dokumenttyp: Artikel ; Jämförande studie UI-nummer: 19090014

Tidskrift

Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 2019;73(4-5)248-56 ISSN 0803-9488 E-ISSN 1502-4725 KIBs bestånd av denna tidskrift Denna tidskrift är expertgranskad (Peer-Reviewed)

Sammanfattning

Purpose and aim: Out from the sparse literature on risk assessment for violence committed by women the Female Additional Manual (FAM) was developed to be a complement to the HCR-20v2. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the psychometrics of the HCR-20v2 with and without the FAM on risk for inpatient physical violence for female forensic psychiatric patients. Methods: The participants were 100 female patients admitted to forensic psychiatric care in a high-security clinic, assessed by clinicians with the HCR-20v2 during their admission. Researchers performed the FAM, both retrospectively and prospectively. The follow-up period was 12 months before being discharged. Results: Four main results were found; first, many risk factors were present although the summary risk ratings were mainly low to moderate. Secondly, the reliability was in general good, where the HCR-20v2 mainly showed higher reliability without than with the FAM, indicating that FAM risk factors did equal or did not contribute to a higher reliability. Third, the internal validity was higher for the HCR-20v2 than for the FAM. Risk factors correlated stronger with the summary risk ratings for the HCR-20v2 than for the FAM. Fourth, the validity for inpatient physical violence was high for the total score of both the HCR-20v2 and the FAM, but contradictory to previous finding the validity for summary risk ratings was not significant. Conclusions: The results support the use of HCR-20v2 when assessing risk for inpatient violence for female forensic psychiatric patients, but with only some support for adding or changing risk factors according to the FAM.