Sök artiklar i SveMed+

Tidskrift

Sammanfattning

BACKGROUND : In order to improve our knowledge about the medical examination, treatment and follow of cancer patients, suggestions have been put forward for a system for quality assurance of clinical data on cancer in Norway (Government White Paper 20: 1997). MATERIAL AND METHODS : In spring 2000, a questionnaire was sent to 41 gynaecological departments with focus on ovarian cancer patients. Four of the departments were regional cancer centres. RESULTS : All gynaecological departments answered the questionnaire. Standard gynaecological examination, vaginal ultrasonography and CA-125 determination were included in the diagnostic procedures in all departments. Some differences were detected: Cytological examination of pleural effusions as part of the staging procedure was not performed by all hospitals. In one health region, hospitals used a Risk of Malignancy Index for referring women with suspected malignant pelvic masses to a centralised gynaecologic oncology unit for primary surgery. Sixteen hospitals out of 37 operated on patients with FIGO stage I disease without performing lympadenectomy. When operating on suspected FIGO stage II-IV disease, three out of 22 local hospitals never performed surgery of the intestines in order to achieve optimal tumour reduction. All regional hospitals gave adjuvant chemotherapy to high-risk FIGO stage I patients. Standard treatment in advanced stages was paclitaxel/carboplatinum. Some hospitals participated in randomized trials on chemotherapy. Third-line treatment depended on the patient's condition, earlier toxicity and response. One regional centre preferred not to give any third-line chemotherapy. Only a few hospitals recorded the patient's performance status (WHO or Karnofsky's grading table) during the treatment and follow-up. Most of the gynaecological departments referred the patients to the regional hospital at the time of recurrence. About half of the outpatient departments gave a written report to the regional hospital. INTERPRETATION : There are differences between the hospitals in how they handle ovarian cancer patients. One cannot, however, determine from this inquiry what kind of medical examination, treatment and follow-up is best. An extended registration of ovarian cancer organised by the Cancer Registry of Norway will be started with the aim of providing reliable population-based data (the OVANOR project).

MeSH