Det köps och införs mer alkohol än någonsin. Vart försvinner den?
Engelsk titel: People are buying and importing more alcohol than ever before. Where is it all going?
Läs online
Författare:
Raitasalo K
;
Mustonen H
;
Mäkelä P
;
Huhtanen P
;
Metso L
Email: heli-mustonen@stakes.fi
Språk: Swe
Antal referenser: 22
Dokumenttyp:
Artikel
UI-nummer: 05113688
Sammanfattning
AIMS: In 2004, quotas on travelers’ imports
of alcoholic beverages from other EU
member states for personal use were
abolished, Estonia became a member
of the EU and taxes on alcohol were
decreased by 33 per cent on average.
These changes resulted in a 10 per cent
increase in alcohol consumption. This
study set out to explore which population
groups accounted for this increase and
what happened to self-reported alcoholrelated
harm.
DATA: The data used in the article consists of a
panel study where the same individuals
completed a postal questionnaire before
and after the changes. The questionnaire
was mailed in autumn 2003 to a random
sample of 4 000 Finnish persons aged
15-69 (response rate 60%) and in autumn
2004 to 1 786 persons who had completed
the questionnaire in 2003 and who also
agreed to participate in the follow-up
(response rate 76%).
RESULTS, DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION:
A central thread in the results is that the
respondents themselves reported no
increase either in their own consumption
or in alcohol-related harm from 2003 to
2004, although this was expected on the
basis of the increase observed in sales
statistics. One possible explanation for
the contradiction between the statistical
evidence and our respondents’ selfreports
is that the price cuts have led
to an increase in consumption mainly among existing heavy
consumers who were not
covered in the questionnaire.
This hypothesis is supported
by reports from the treatment
sector and by police records
on intoxicated persons
taken into custody. Another
possible explanation is
selective non-response, i.e.
that heavier drinkers have
dropped out more often than
others. The non-response
analyses indicated that part
of the results that confl icted
with our expectations
was due to selective nonresponse.
The results of our study do
not warrant the conclusion
that there will be no adverse
consequences in terms of
alcohol-related harm from
the changes implemented
in 2004. If consumption
increases most of all among
heavy consumers, that will
lead to a greater increase
in serious alcohol-related
harm than would a growth
of consumption among
moderate drinkers. If
consumption levels settle at
a higher level, it is possible
that harms will increase in
the mainstream population
as well.