Sök artiklar i SveMed+

Observera: SveMed+ upphör att uppdateras!



Å leve i forhandlinger - pasienterfaringer av å vaere i den diagnostiske prosessen med å få diagnosen KOLS
Engelsk titel: Living with negotiations - patient experiences of being in the diagnostic process of getting a COPD diagnosis Läs online Författare: Lindgre, Sari ; Storli, Sissel Lisa ; Wiklund-Gustin, Lena Språk: Nor Antal referenser: 38 Dokumenttyp: Artikel UI-nummer: 16113607

Tidskrift

Geriatrisk Sykepleie 2016;8(1)26-35 ISSN 1891-1889 E-ISSN 1893-563X KIBs bestånd av denna tidskrift Denna tidskrift är expertgranskad (Peer-Reviewed)

Sammanfattning

Background: The shame of a self-inflicted disease is a reason for delaying taking the initiative to seek medical advice. Experiences of self-blame and helplessness undermine patients’ sense of control and contribute to poor self-management. The aim of this study is to illuminate patients’ lived experiences of being in the diagnostic process of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Method: A phenomenological-hermeneutic analysis was applied in the interpretation of interviews with eight persons diagnosed with mild or moderate COPD. Results: One main theme «living in negotiation» and three subthemes «living with a body out of step with the diagnosis», «dealing with the past» and «being challenged by the future» reflected the process participants were living through in their quest for acceptance and a new balance in life. The diagnosis itself was «a slap in the face». Shame and guilt related to the diagnosis had origins in the past. This interfered with the present moment and gave rise to uncertainty for the future. Conclusion: The diagnosis seems to be a breakdown of life, which puts life itself at stake. The diagnosis should be communicated face-to-face, clearly and with empathy, and followed by information about COPD. In order to support the patient, an openhearted attitude and lifeworld knowledge are required. Healthcare professionals should allow time, listen to the patient´s narrative, and thus develop a shared understanding of the temporal aspect of the illness and patients’ needs and concerns. Thus, good communication is essential in determining whether the patient remains in negotiation or enters a process towards acceptance and new understanding.